Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T6vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Lightest1,609 kg3,547 lb
- Best power-to-weight190 hp/t142 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,055 km655 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T6 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,609kg3,547lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 177g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T6 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 4 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T6 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 177 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Is 321 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























