Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5vsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,583 kg3,490 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,436 km892 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,583kg3,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 1,436km892mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 has 30 hp more than Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,436 km 892 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,144 km 711 mi | 1,436 km 892 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 6 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 292 km (182 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























