Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4vsVolvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,205 km749 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,205km749mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,205 km 749 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | VolvoS902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,205 km 749 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Is 301 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 384 km (239 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























