Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,364 km847 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,578kg3,479lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 57.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,164km723mi Calculated | 1,364km847mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 335L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 57.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 has 3 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,364 km 847 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,164 km 723 mi | 1,364 km 847 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 83 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























