Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60
2.4i T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score79/100
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Largest trunk424 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,953cc180cu in | 2,401cc147cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,428mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 424L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,034L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,800-4,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 has 90 hp more than Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Has 44 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























