Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20VvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight190 hp/t142 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Largest trunk424 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,609kg3,547lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,401cc147cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has 46 hp more than Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























