Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5vsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km379mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,476mm176in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 has 5 hp more than Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 6.8 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 611 km 379 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 379 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 461 km (286 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























