Volkswagen Jetta VI
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSIvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,644mm183in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,778mm70in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,482mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,651mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 15 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 357 km (222 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























