Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5vsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,437 kg3,168 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,437kg3,168lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 86.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | 713km443mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 233L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700-5,100 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 has 20 hp more than Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 6.7 s |
Although Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 has more power, Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 619 km 385 mi |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 713 km 443 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | 713 km 443 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Is 63 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























