Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5vsAUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8N)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range674 km419 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | 674km419mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700-5,100 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 has 15 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 6.9 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
Although Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 619 km 385 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 674 km 419 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.3 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | 674 km 419 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5 | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.3 20V T5
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























