Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VvsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions203 g/km
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Lightest1,437 kg3,168 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,508kg3,325lb | 1,437kg3,168lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,266mm168in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 921L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 6.7 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 713 km 443 mi |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























