Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Lightest1,950 kg4,299 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted235 km/h146 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,850kg6,283lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 36.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 173g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | - | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,280 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 36.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 7.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 173 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 305 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























