Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSIvsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Largest trunk493 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Lightest2,078 kg4,581 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,329kg5,135lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | 2,910kg6,415lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 888km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,737mm68in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,658mm65in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 493L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,555L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI has 13 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 2,329 kg 5,135 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,329 kg 5,135 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 888 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 493 L 17.4 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























