Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range983 km611 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,614 kg3,558 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,843kg4,063lb | 1,614kg3,558lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 983km611mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,426mm174in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,604mm103in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 18 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 983 km 611 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 744 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 983 km 611 mi | 744 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 239 km (148 mi) more estimated range
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 18 hp more
- Is 229 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























