Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,613kg3,556lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,979mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has 35 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.0 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 8.9 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 2.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.0 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 8.9 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 492 kg lighter
- Is 2.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 35 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























