Volkswagen Transporter (T6)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest2,060 kg4,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed202 km/h126 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range825 km512 mi
- Best performance score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 202 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 118.4s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 118.7s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km512mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,904mm193in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,990mm78in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,979mm117in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Max trunk volume | 5,800L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 118.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 202 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 134 km/h 83 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 16 hp more than Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 825 km 512 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.4 s | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 202 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 512 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 5,800 L 204.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 km (50 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























