Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest2,060 kg4,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed201 km/h125 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range959 km596 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 199hp148kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,269kg5,002lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.4s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 155.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 88hp/t65kW/t40hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 959km596mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,304mm209in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,990mm78in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,400mm134in | 2,979mm117in |
| Ground clearance | 202mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Max trunk volume | 6,700L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,800-4,000 rpm | 1,400-2,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 155.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 131 km/h 81 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 199 hp 148 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 21 hp more than Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 2,269 kg 5,002 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 9.1 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 88 hp/t 65 kW/t 11.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 959 km 596 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 199 hp 148 kW | 9.1 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 88 hp/t 65 kW/t 11.4 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTransporter (T6.1)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 199 hp 148 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,269 kg 5,002 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 959 km 596 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 6,700 L 236.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 88 hp/t 65 kW/t 11.4 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Transporter (T6.1) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 214 km (133 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























