Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Lightest1,753 kg3,865 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range845 km525 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score88/100
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,753kg3,865lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,979mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 845 km 525 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 307 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























