Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,053km654mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,979mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,053 km 654 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 308 km (191 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 72 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























