Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2016-2018
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
240hp179kW
220hp164kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
68.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
28.0s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
745km463mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,586mm62in
-
Rear track
1,576mm62in
-
Ground clearance
200mm8in
203mm8in
Trunk volume
615L
-
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
221g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI4,400-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.0 s
-
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
2,060 kg
4,542 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
228 km/h
142 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
745 km
463 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
8.6 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
8.6 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
2,060 kg
4,542 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
745 km
463 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
221 g/km
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 340 kg lighter
  • Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 38 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 54 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
380 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster