Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5vsVolkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Taigo
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,229 kg2,709 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range784 km487 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful213 hp159 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 213hp159kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,569kg3,459lb | 1,229kg2,709lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 48.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 760km472mi Calculated | 784km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,266mm168in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,554mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,516mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,222L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 48.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 has 63 hp more than Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 63 hp (47 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 760 km 472 mi |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 784 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 213 hp 159 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 760 km 472 mi | 784 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 | Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Has 63 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























