Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4vsVolkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Taigo
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,229 kg2,709 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,476kg3,254lb | 1,229kg2,709lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.9s Calculated | 48.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 784km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,266mm168in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,554mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,516mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,222L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.9 s | 48.9 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 has more power, Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 784 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 784 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 | Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 247 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























