Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

3.6 FSI V6

280 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    809 km
    503 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
190hp142kW
280hp209kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,700kg5,952lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
660km410mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
3,597cc220cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance
161mm6in
203mm8in
Trunk volume
445L
-
Max trunk volume
1,290L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V66,200 rpm3,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
-
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
280 hp
209 kW

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has 90 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 90 hp (67 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
2,105 kg
4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V68.9 s

Although Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 3.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
660 km
410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
280 hp
209 kW
8.9 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
8.9 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
660 km
410 mi
CO2 score
-
247 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 685 kg lighter
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 90 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
530 V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
3.6 FSI V6
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
530 TSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster