Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,058 km
    657 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,872kg4,127lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
67.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
86.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
66.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
1,058km657mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
216mm9in
Trunk volume
445L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,290L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions-
137g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,180 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
66.9 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,872 kg
4,127 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,058 km
657 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
8.4 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,872 kg
4,127 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
1,058 km
657 mi
CO2 score
-
137 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 452 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 249 km (155 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 D4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster