Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TDI SCR

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    107 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
150hp112kW
220hp164kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.6s
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,078km670mi
Calculated
745km463mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance
161mm6in
203mm8in
Trunk volume
445L
-
Max trunk volume
1,290L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions
134g/km
221g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR-1,750-3,000 rpm3,250 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI4,400-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 70 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
2,060 kg
4,542 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
200 km/h
124 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR8.4 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI8.6 s

Although Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 4.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,078 km
670 mi
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
745 km
463 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
200 km/h
124 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
8.6 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
2,060 kg
4,542 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
1,078 km
670 mi
745 km
463 mi
CO2 score
134 g/km
221 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Is 530 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 334 km (207 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 87 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 TSI
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 TDI SCR
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 TSI
380 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR vs Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster