Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6vsVolkswagen Phideon 480V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T6

306 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen Phideon

480V6

299 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2016-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    184 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    978 km
    608 mi
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Power
306hp228kW
299hp223kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
2,025kg4,464lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
67.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
18.2s
Calculated
20.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
978km608mi
Calculated
824km512mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
5,074mm200in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,463mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
3,009mm118in
Front track
1,578mm62in
-
Rear track
1,575mm62in
-
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
75L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Volkswagen Phideon 480V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65,700 rpm2,100-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
VolkswagenPhideon480V65,250-6,500 rpm2,900-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.2 s
20.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
299 hp
223 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has 7 hp more than Volkswagen Phideon 480V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 480V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
2,025 kg
4,464 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65.9 s
VolkswagenPhideon480V66.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
978 km
608 mi
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
824 km
512 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
299 hp
223 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Power
299 hp
223 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Power
299 hp
223 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 s
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhideon480V6
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6VolkswagenPhideon480V6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
299 hp
223 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in
Range score
978 km
608 mi
824 km
512 mi
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Volkswagen Phideon 480V6
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 365 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Volkswagen Phideon 480V6

  • Has 40 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T6
Volkswagen Phideon 480V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
480V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon480V6vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
480V6
3.6 V6 FSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon480V6vsVolkswagenPassat (B7)3.6 V6 FSI
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
480V6
4.2 V8
VS
VolkswagenPhideon480V6vsVolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20104.2 V8
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
480V6
4.2 V8
VS
VolkswagenPhideon480V6vsVolkswagenPhaetonFacelift 20104.2 V8
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
480V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon480V6vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
2.0 T6
2.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0 T6
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 vs Volkswagen Phideon 480V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster