Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has more power, Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























