Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.4 D5vsVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf V Variant
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,362 kg3,003 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,453kg3,203lb | 1,362kg3,003lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,556mm179in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,504mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,495L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 952 km 592 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 | Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 199 km (124 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Is 91 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 88 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























