Car comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2009-2014
VS

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2009-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,298 kg
    2,862 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.1 L/100 km
    23.3 mpg US
    28.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    743 km
    462 mi
  • Largest trunk
    312 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,298kg2,862lb
1,514kg3,338lb
Gross weight
1,740kg3,836lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
84.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
97.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
28.0s
Calculated
34.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
743km462mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,256mm168in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
106mm4in
Trunk volume
312L
205L
Max trunk volume
1,006L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.0 s
34.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1,298 kg
2,862 lb
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
1,514 kg
3,338 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
743 km
462 mi
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
6.9 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,298 kg
2,862 lb
1,514 kg
3,338 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
743 km
462 mi
714 km
444 mi
Trunk score
312 L
11.0 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Is 216 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster