Volkswagen Bora IV
Car comparison
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSIvsVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score45/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,222 km759 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,448kg3,192lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 39.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 1,222km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,688mm106in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 506L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 120g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 39.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 926 km 575 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,222 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 1,222 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 120 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI | Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Is 133 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 296 km (184 mi) more estimated range
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























