Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200dvsVolkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Bora IV
1.4 280TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.8s Calculated | 34.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km531mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,815mm71in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,688mm106in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 126mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | - | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.8 s | 34.9 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 854 km 531 mi |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 531 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d | Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























