Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200dvsVolkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018

C 200d

150 hp1950 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2018
VS

Volkswagen Bora IV

1.4 280TSI

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dVolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight
2,165kg4,773lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
68.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
33.8s
Calculated
34.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
854km531mi
Calculated
926km575mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,950cc119cu in
1,395cc85cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,663mm184in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,815mm71in
Height
1,442mm57in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,688mm106in
Front track
1,588mm63in
-
Ground clearance
92mm4in
126mm5in
Trunk volume-
506L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
41L
50L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200dVolkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSIPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d-1,400-2,800 rpm3,050 rpm
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dVolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.8 s
34.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
150 hp
112 kW
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
1,315 kg
2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
222 km/h
138 mph
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
854 km
531 mi
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
926 km
575 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
150 hp
112 kW
8.1 s
222 km/h
138 mph
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.1 s
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200dVolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
854 km
531 mi
926 km
575 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200dVolkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI

  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200d
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d vs Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster