Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3vsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful152 hp113 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Largest trunk324 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,288 kg2,840 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 152hp113kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,479kg3,261lb | 1,288kg2,840lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 90.4s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.8s Calculated | 81.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,127km700mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,288mm169in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,524mm99in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,556mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.8 s | 81.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,288 kg 2,840 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20161.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 152 hp 113 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb | 1,288 kg 2,840 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,127 km 700 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Is 191 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























