Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIvsToyota RAV4 V 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota RAV4 V
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions147 g/km
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 243Nm179lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.7s Calculated | 53.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,487cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,690mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 6,600 rpm | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.7 s | 53.0 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 8.5 s |
Although Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI | Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 157 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 308 km (191 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























