Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Toyota Celica (T20)

2.0 Turbo

242 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedLiftback / fastback1994-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.5 s
Fastest top speed
260 km/h
162 mph Unrestricted
250 km/h
155 mph Restricted
Most powerful
280 hp
209 kW
Highest torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Best estimated range
930 km
578 mi
Largest trunk
563 L
Best overall score
70/100
Best performance score
65/100
Best economy score
88/100
Best practicality score
82/100

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

Lightest
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
Best power-to-weight
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power	280hp209kW	242hp180kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	302Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight	1,656kg3,651lb	1,390kg3,064lb
Gross weight	2,270kg5,004lb	1,785kg3,935lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated	91.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.5s	6.1s
0-200 km/h	22.1s Calculated	25.1s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.2s Calculated	5.8s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK	9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	13.7s Calculated	14.3s Calculated
Power-to-weight	169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated	174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated	217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	930km578mi Calculated	716km445mi Calculated
Displacement	1,984cc121cu in	1,998cc122cu in
Length	4,866mm192in	4,420mm174in
Width	1,871mm74in	1,750mm69in
Height	1,460mm57in	1,305mm51in
Wheelbase	2,835mm112in	2,450mm96in
Front track	1,591mm63in	1,510mm59in
Rear track	1,580mm62in	1,490mm59in
Ground clearance	138mm5in	-
Trunk volume	563L	208L
Max trunk volume	1,557L	-
Doors	5	3
Seats	5	4
Fuel tank	66L	68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 TurboPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	5,100-6,500 rpm	2,000-4,900 rpm	6,750 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	6,000 rpm	4,000 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.2 s	5.8 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.5 s	6.1 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	22.1 s	25.1 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.1 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	5.8 s	6.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	8.9 s	9.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.5 s	12.0 s
1/4 mile 402 m	13.7 s	14.3 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	165 km/h 102 mph	160 km/h 99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	280 hp 209 kW
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	242 hp 180 kW

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 38 hp more than Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	302 Nm 223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	1,656 kg 3,651 lb
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	1,390 kg 3,064 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	5.5 s
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	930 km 578 mi
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	716 km 445 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	280 hp 209 kW	5.5 s	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	242 hp 180 kW	6.1 s	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	5.5 s
Top speed Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	563 L 19.9 cu ft
Length	4,866 mm 191.6 in
Height	1,460 mm 57.5 in

ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo

Power	242 hp 180 kW
0-100 km/h	6.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

Doors/seats	3 doors 4 seats
Trunk	208 L 7.3 cu ft
Length	4,420 mm 174.0 in
Height	1,305 mm 51.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	5.5 s
Top speed Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph

7.1 L/100 km

33.1 mpg US

39.8 mpg UK

ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo

Power	242 hp 180 kW
0-100 km/h	6.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

9.5 L/100 km

24.8 mpg US

29.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK	5.5 s
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK	6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI	169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp	7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo	174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp	9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI

ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo

Power

280 hp

209 kW

242 hp

180 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

302 Nm

223 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.5 s

6.1 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

260 km/h162 mph

Restricted

250 km/h155 mph

Unrestricted

250 km/h155 mph

Restricted

240 km/h149 mph

Lightness

1,656 kg

3,651 lb

1,390 kg

3,064 lb

Fuel consumption

7.1 L/100 km

33.1 mpg US

39.8 mpg UK

9.5 L/100 km

24.8 mpg US

29.7 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	563 L 19.9 cu ft
Length	4,866 mm 191.6 in
Height	1,460 mm 57.5 in

Doors/seats	3 doors 4 seats
Trunk	208 L 7.3 cu ft
Length	4,420 mm 174.0 in
Height	1,305 mm 51.4 in

Range score

930 km

578 mi

716 km

445 mi

Trunk score

563 L

19.9 cu ft

208 L

7.3 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

169 hp/t

126 kW/t

5.9 kg/hp

174 hp/t

130 kW/t

5.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI	Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption	7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK	9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	12.42 LC100 km	16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	20.00 LC100 mi	26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal	1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,864 LC/year	2,494 LC/year