Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Most powerful181 hp135 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 231Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,164km723mi Calculated | 897km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW |
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has 1 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 8.3 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 9.0 s |
Although Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 897 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,164 km 723 mi | 897 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 | Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Has 9 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (166 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























