Volkswagen Tiguan I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSIvsSubaru Forester III 2.5 XT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Forester III
2.5 XT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range719 km447 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,662kg3,664lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 58.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 719km447mi Calculated | 561km348mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,427mm174in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,604mm103in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 387L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 5,200 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW |
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 719 km 447 mi |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 561 km 348 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | SubaruForester III2.5 XT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 719 km 447 mi | 561 km 348 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 387 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI | Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























