AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6vsSubaru Forester III 2.5 XT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Forester III
2.5 XT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 58.1s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 30.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 561km348mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 387L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 5,200 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 30.4 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 has 10 hp more than Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 6.5 s |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 6.0 s |
Although AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 has more power, Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 and Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 561 km 348 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | SubaruForester III2.5 XT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 561 km 348 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 387 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 | Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 439 km (273 mi) more estimated range
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























