Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 TurbovsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range744 km462 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,614kg3,558lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 571km355mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,560mm180in | 4,426mm174in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,700mm67in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,615mm103in | 2,604mm103in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,571mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,660L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 248g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 5,200 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo has 19 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 571 km 355 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 744 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 571 km 355 mi | 744 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 248 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 69 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 173 km (107 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























