Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsSubaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru BRZ I
Premium 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
- Lightest1,262 kg2,782 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk243 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 205Nm151lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,586kg3,497lb | 1,262kg2,782lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 100.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 162Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 704km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,240mm167in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 243L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0 and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,586 kg 3,497 lb |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 1,262 kg 2,782 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 733 km 456 mi |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 704 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,586 kg 3,497 lb | 1,262 kg 2,782 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 704 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI | Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
- Is 324 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























