Car comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe

2.0 16V Turbo

205 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012
VS

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,503 kg
    3,314 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    825 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    423 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
205hp153kW
210hp157kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,503kg3,314lb
1,586kg3,497lb
Gross weight
1,923kg4,239lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
97.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
100.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
34.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
733km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,423mm174in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,400mm55in
1,444mm57in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,578mm101in
Front track-
1,545mm61in
Rear track-
1,547mm61in
Trunk volume
423L
205L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
66L
55L
CO2 emissions-
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
34.1 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,586 kg
3,497 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
236 km/h
147 mph
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has more power, Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
825 km
513 mi
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
205 hp
153 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
1,586 kg
3,497 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
733 km
456 mi
CO2 score
-
174 g/km
Trunk score
423 L
14.9 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 83 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 218 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo vs Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster