Car comparison

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb IV Combi

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2025-present
VS

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

193 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,646 kg
    3,629 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    695 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    232 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Largest trunk
    690 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
204hp152kW
193hp144kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,746kg3,849lb
1,646kg3,629lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,290kg5,049lb
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
73.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
28.8s
Calculated
30.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
869km540mi
Calculated
1,119km695mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,902mm193in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,506mm59in
1,451mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,836mm112in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,583mm62in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
-
Trunk volume
690L
590L
Max trunk volume
1,920L
1,632L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,250 rpm3,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.8 s
30.3 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
1,746 kg
3,849 lb
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,646 kg
3,629 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI7.4 s
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
869 km
540 mi
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,119 km
695 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.4 s
232 km/h
144 mph
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,902 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
193 hp
144 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,746 kg
3,849 lb
1,646 kg
3,629 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,902 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Range score
869 km
540 mi
1,119 km
695 mi
Trunk score
690 L
24.4 cu ft
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 250 km (155 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsCupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
520d
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster