Skoda Superb IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIvsBMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Touring (G61)
520d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,746 kg3,849 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk690 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score91/100
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,746kg3,849lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 74.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 869km540mi Calculated | 1,017km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,902mm193in | 5,060mm199in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,506mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,634mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 155mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 690L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,920L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 197 hp 147 kW |
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 1,746 kg 3,849 lb |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 869 km 540 mi |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 1,017 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,746 kg 3,849 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 869 km 540 mi | 1,017 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI | BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























