Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat Variant (B9)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,688 kg3,721 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,138 km707 mi
- Largest trunk690 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,696kg3,739lb | 1,688kg3,721lb |
| Gross weight | 2,168kg4,780lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 76.7s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 30.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 1,138km707mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,574mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 690L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,920L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
Although Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 825 km 513 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 1,138 km 707 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 1,138 km 707 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B9) 2.0 TDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 8 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 313 km (194 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























