Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present
VS

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,550 kg
    3,417 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    943 km
    586 mi
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,550kg3,417lb
1,696kg3,739lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,168kg4,780lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
78.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
80.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
31.0s
Calculated
31.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
943km586mi
Calculated
825km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,866mm192in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,451mm57in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,836mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance-
138mm5in
Trunk volume
590L
660L
Max trunk volume
1,632L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.0 s
31.6 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,696 kg
3,739 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI8.0 s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
943 km
586 mi
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
825 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
8.0 s
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.0 s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
943 km
586 mi
825 km
513 mi
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 146 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
320d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster