Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,536 kg3,386 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions118 g/km
- Best estimated range1,467 km911 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,536kg3,386lb | 1,882kg4,149lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 88.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,467km911mi Calculated | 1,170km727mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 118g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,467 km 911 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,467 km 911 mi | 1,170 km 727 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 118 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Is 346 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 296 km (184 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























