Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2020
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    118 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,467 km
    911 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,450 kg
    3,197 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,536kg3,386lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight
2,210kg4,872lb
2,025kg4,464lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
82.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
33.9s
Calculated
31.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,467km911mi
Calculated
1,067km663mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
660L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
48L
CO2 emissions
118g/km
119g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.9 s
31.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,536 kg
3,386 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI8.4 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.07.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,467 km
911 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,067 km
663 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
8.4 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,536 kg
3,386 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,467 km
911 mi
1,067 km
663 mi
CO2 score
118 g/km
119 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 400 km (249 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 300 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Is 86 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
320d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
Cooper SD 2.0
520d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolvoV902.0 D4
Cooper SD 2.0
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
20d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
Cooper SD 2.0
CLA 220
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster