Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III Combi
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,571 km976 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Largest trunk660 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,571km976mi Calculated | 1,404km873mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,767mm188in | 4,856mm191in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 8.1 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,571 km 976 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,571 km 976 mi | 1,404 km 873 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























