Skoda Superb III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,529kg3,371lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI has 6 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
Although Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























