Car comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2019-2021
VS

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Lightest
    1,541 kg
    3,397 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    695 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,633kg3,600lb
1,541kg3,397lb
Gross weight
2,098kg4,625lb
2,160kg4,762lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
131.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
38.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,065km661mi
Calculated
1,119km695mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,869mm192in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,836mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,583mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
625L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions-
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
38.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
90 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,633 kg
3,600 lb
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,541 kg
3,397 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI7.7 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,065 km
661 mi
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,119 km
695 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,633 kg
3,600 lb
1,541 kg
3,397 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
1,065 km
661 mi
1,119 km
695 mi
CO2 score
-
135 g/km
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 92 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster