Car comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2021-2023
VS

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,647 kg
    3,631 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    131 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,294 km
    804 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,647kg3,631lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Gross weight
2,125kg4,685lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
134.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
127.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,219km758mi
Calculated
1,294km804mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,869mm192in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,581mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
-
Trunk volume
625L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
66L
CO2 emissions
131g/km
134g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI-1,900-3,300 rpm3,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
40.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
1,650 kg
3,638 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
241 km/h
150 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI7.7 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,219 km
758 mi
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
1,294 km
804 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
1,219 km
758 mi
1,294 km
804 mi
CO2 score
131 g/km
134 g/km
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Is 3 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster